Overview / Usage

I’ve spent a lot of time working with code. Over the years, I’ve seen how artificial intelligence (AI) has changed the way we write, check, and review programs. One of the biggest changes recently has been the ability to detect AI-generated source code. This means tools can now tell if a piece of code was written by a human or by an AI model like ChatGPT or GitHub Copilot.

This topic has become especially important in schools, companies, and coding competitions. People want to know where the code came from. That’s where something like an AI Detector for Source Code comes in handy.

At first, I wasn’t sure how these detectors even worked. But after using a few and reading about them, I found out they analyze things like code structure, syntax patterns, and even the way comments are written. These tools can spot the tiny signs that tell whether a machine or a human wrote the code.

AI tools are amazing, and I use them too. But it’s still important to know who or what wrote a program. There are times when using AI is okay and times when it’s not. For example, if a company is hiring a developer, they want to be sure the person can actually write the code themselves. In school, using AI to do all the work could mean the student isn’t learning anything.

AI-generated code can also cause bugs or security issues if it’s not reviewed carefully. Sometimes it looks perfect but has hidden errors. That’s why being able to detect AI-written code helps teams maintain better quality and safety.

So how do these detectors know the difference between human and machine code? From what I’ve seen, they use machine learning models trained on tons of code samples. The AI learns to tell how humans usually code compared to how machines do it.

Machines often write code that’s very clean and structured, sometimes too perfect. They may use variable names that are simple or generic, and their formatting is often extremely consistent. Human-written code, on the other hand, usually has more variety.

Some detectors even look at things like how frequently certain patterns appear. They can tell if something looks too "robotic." It's kind of funny to think about—AI detecting other AI.

I’ve noticed that AI coding assistants are everywhere now. Tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Replit Ghostwriter make it easier to write scripts, solve bugs, or even build full projects. While this is great for productivity, it also means more code is being written by machines.

That’s not always a bad thing. But still, it raises questions about ownership and originality. For example, if AI writes most of your code, who owns the final result? That’s another reason companies are turning to source code detectors—they want to protect their intellectual property.

Teachers and professors use AI detection tools to check student work. I’ve seen cases where someone tried to pass off AI code as their own, but the tool flagged it instantly. In job interviews, companies sometimes use these detectors to make sure the candidate didn’t just copy code from online or use an AI model to solve a test problem.

Even in open-source projects, code detection helps track where code came from. This adds transparency and builds trust between developers.

To be honest, yes—it’s possible. Just like with AI writing tools, some people try to rewrite the code a little so it doesn’t look like a machine wrote it. They may change variable names, add extra comments, or move lines around. Sometimes that works. But most of the good detectors are getting smarter and can still catch the signs.

Still, it's not a perfect science. That’s why it's best to use detection tools as a guide, not as the final answer.

There’s a lot to think about when it comes to using AI in programming. Just because you can use AI doesn’t always mean you should. Companies are still figuring out how to set rules. In some places, using AI without telling anyone might even be considered cheating or copyright infringement.

I believe it’s better to be honest and open about AI usage. That way, everyone knows what’s going on, and people can work together more fairly.

Methodology / Approach

......

Technologies Used

.......